While I understand your perspective, I believe it’s important to recognize that the renaming of places like Grandin Park reflects a broader trend that can indeed be seen as a form of cancel culture. It’s not merely about removing an honor; it’s about how we choose to acknowledge and engage with our history.
There were many who provided exceptional documentation to support the significance of Grandin's contributions to our community. Furthermore, there are 94 recommendations in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's report, and not one of them suggests removing names, including Grandin's. Erasing his name from our landmarks could deny us the opportunity to learn from our past and understand its complexities. Our names and places are tied to our collective identity and heritage. Rather than removing names, we can foster meaningful discussions that honor our history while also ensuring our community remains inclusive and respectful of all voices.
2 0
They are reimbursed for the cost but not the time spent making the changes.
0 0
The online survey by our city regarding the renaming of Grandin Park was deeply flawed and breaches established policies. The survey lacked transparency in its methodology, failing to reach a representative segment of our community. The reliance on a limited audience for feedback raises questions about its validity. The survey did not adequately inform participants the implications of the renaming, leading to confusion and uninformed responses. Many residents felt their voices were not represented, violating our Public Participation Policy. Furthermore, the limited timeframe for collecting responses did not allow for comprehensive community engagement, leaving many feeling sidelined. These procedural shortcomings undermine the integrity of the decision-making process and set the stage for potential legal challenges. We are committed to holding the council accountable and ensuring future processes adhere to established policies and genuinely reflect the views of our entire community.
1 0 0
While I appreciate these perspectives, I fundamentally disagree with the desire to change the name of our subdivision. Renaming Grandin is not just about addressing historical grievances; it threatens to erase the rich history and identity of our community. Bishop Vital Grandin's legacy is complex, but altering the name won't change our shared history or the lessons we've learned from it. Many residents feel that the push for renaming lacks genuine community engagement and fails to represent the overwhelming majority who oppose it. Change, while sometimes necessary, shouldn’t come at the cost of erasing our local heritage. Instead, let’s focus on education and dialogue that honors our past while allowing us to move forward together. This isn't about ignoring history; it's about acknowledging it and using it as a platform for learning and growth, not erasure. The Grandin name carries significance for many residents, and its removal would diminish our community's identity.
0 0 0
All Alberta Municipalities: The Cancel Culture Governance in St. Albert
St. Albert’s city council in establishing a naming committee that *50 secretive signatures and addresses** from potential outside activists highlight a concerning trend. Instead of engaging residents in an open dialogue to remove the name Grandin from a subdivision, council members have predetermined the change is necessary and limited public discussion to requesting new name suggestions. This approach violates the city’s Municipal Naming Policy C-CC-05, Public Participation Policy C-CAO-20, and the Common Law Principle of Procedural Fairness. Despite 82% of Gazette poll respondents opposing the change and strong community sentiment for a referendum, council members denied the right to a plebiscite. In light of these practices, I have submitted a formal complaint to the Minister of Municipalities. This is a crucial warning for all Alberta municipalities to transparency, accountability, and community engagement.
1 1 0
The proposed renaming of Grandin Park should alarm anyone who values fair representation and community input. The city survey and forum treated the name change as a foregone conclusion, blatantly excluding supporters of keeping the park's name. This breach of the city’s own fair participation policy undermines the democratic process. Despite **82%** of Gazette respondents supporting the existing name and **420 residents** signing my petition, the council has dismissed this overwhelming sentiment, including Councilor Sheena Hughes's motion to place the issue on the ballot. Instead, **$325,000** of taxpayer money was wasted to manipulate the process. This disregard threatens not only the name of Grandin Park and the Grandin Park subdivision but also engages outside activists who, with just 50 signatures, could erase our history. This puts all our historic names, including St. Albert itself, at risk. Consequently, I have filed a complaint with the Minister of Municipalities.
4 0 0
No listings have been posted by Mark Cassidy
You are right it won’t end while this council is in place the naming committee is all set up to erase our history
2 0