I find it interesting how it is made to appear the residents are requiring the need for bigger arena and aquatic facilities. The survey that was done on what was more important – addition to the library, arena or aquatic facilities was done on a tiny scale. There was not an option to say no to all of it. You had to pick one of the three in order of importance whether you wanted any or none at all. Then the tax increase that went along with it. This process I feel was not done fairly or is in any way representing the public's opinion on what they want and agree to in tax increases.
As taxpayers we need to reflect back on the past four years to give a grade on the mayor and city council’s “achievements.”
Have they thought outside the box to spend our tax dollars wisely, fairly and to the benefit of everyone?
At issue are a number of projects. There is the so-called millions of dollars “circle” built as a monument to City Hall. The painting of street corner sidewalks and roads. The “brick” covering on the overhead walkway. The allocation of public funds to favourite organizations. The downtown parking fiasco. Councillors bickering.
It was nice to get an almost even team with three common sense representatives versus three non but then the deciding vote would be left to the mayor. Family members and friends being on boards which tried to sway funds being routed to special interests.
October 2017 brings us options of a council and mayor to vote for with common sense, fiscal responsibility and willing transparency.
Happy New Year!
J. Ritchie, St. Albert
