In support of the new branch library concept, Jennifer Hamilton (Gazette, May 20) wrote: “While some have suggested the use of existing buildings, rather than building a new branch; it is not only space for books that is needed, but also specific space to be utilized for specific programs.”
With respect, the library does not require spaces that can't be created in existing leased spaces (e.g. old London Drugs). The City of Edmonton has most of its library branches in leased spaces, right alongside other grocery stores and restaurants. They take advantage of existing shared parking, existing roadways, and established bus routes.
I recently read the Library Feasibility Study done several years ago in which they discounted existing commercial space as a more expensive overall solution given a time span of 25 years. The problem is three-fold; one, the economy isn't exactly thriving for many taxpayers right now; two, the City hasn't exactly hit the nail on the head when it comes to reining in costs of new large projects; and three, we have no idea where technology and innovation will take us in 25 years.
It is quite possible that having flexibility in current leased spaces could be the smartest thing we do. We still would expand our library and get the branch many want, just not the Cadillac version.
A plebiscite on the issue may show many taxpayers might agree with me.
Ken Klak, St. Albert
