I found the views by Elizabeth Allchin (Gazette, Dec.27) to be both concerning and disappointing in regards to public programs at the St. Albert Public Library. Stating how there is a “problem” these programs are taking place at the library is short-sighted. In 2014, library programs had 44,911 attendees – no small amount. The library acts as the community hub for these programs and for people to utilize them – including people who may not be financially able to go elsewhere.
Questioning how the affordable library programs for those who are disadvantaged could “impinge on the livelihood of people in the community” is like saying we should not have a food bank because it could be problematic for the livelihood of grocers. Library programs allow the potential for social mobility by the gaining and improvement of skills, and are an overwhelmingly positive force in our society.
In my opinion, the library is a very suitable and appropriate community setting for these programs. Stating how she “can remember when a library was a repository for books, where you could sit and read in a quiet place, study if need be,” Ms. Allchin seems very out of touch with our library as there are very clear areas that are quiet where anyone can read or study. I have studied many times at the library over the years and have never once been bothered by any program being held simultaneously. There are separate rooms and designated areas for programs that do not infringe on the service quality of others.
I sincerely hope others can learn to consider situations other than just their own and occasionally put themselves in other people’s shoes.
Aulden Maj-Pfleger, St. Albert
