Skip to content

Land near Big Lake should remain open for industrial development: committee

A member of Big Lake Environment Support Society (BLESS) said he is "very disappointed" in the council committee's recommendation.
1506 meadowview sup 1 C

A council committee is recommending land near Big Lake remain open for industrial development, though a group aiming to safeguard Big Lake says removing the option would help protect important natural areas in St. Albert. 

Currently, St. Albert’s Municipal Development Plan (MDP) — a high-level document that outlines general land uses for areas within city limits, alongside policies to guide the city as it grows — designates the land directly south of Meadowview Drive and West of Ray Gibbon Drive as employment area. On May 31, 2021, then-councillor Jacquie Hansen put forward a motion to change the land’s designation to major open spaces to protect a greater amount of land near Big Lake.

Council voted at that time to gather more information about the implications of the proposed motion. 

While employment areas outline land for industrial and office-based use, major open spaces outline land to be enhanced and protected for its natural features as the city grows. These areas are often environmentally sensitive and include the Sturgeon River and Carrot Creek corridors. 

City administration returned to council’s community growth and infrastructure standing committee Monday afternoon with a presentation outlining stakeholder and landowner engagement, after which the committee voted to abandon the motion. 

Council is set to vote on the committee’s recommendation during their upcoming June 20 council meeting.

Tony Druett, member of Big Lake Environmental Support Society (BLESS), said Monday evening that he is “very disappointed” in the council committee’s recommendation, but “not surprised.”

“City planning personnel have been quite co-operative, but they’ve been quite clearly trying to come up with arguments why not to make this change,” Druett said. 

BLESS would like to see Meadowview Drive become a boundary road to the area the city has carved out for industrial development, rather than run directly through it, Druett said. 

He added that the area below Meadowview Drive above Big Lake is “precious” from an environmental point of view, noting flocks of birds such as swans and pelicans, as well as a swathe of other wildlife, utilize the area. 

“That particular part of the lake is one of the most sensitive nesting areas, much more so than most of the lakeshore,” Druett said. “We really want to limit anything near to that area.” 

Land is developable: city 

Lyndsay Francis, senior planner with St. Albert, told council’s committee Monday afternoon that the land below Meadowview Drive is developable, and not within a flood line. 

“The major open spaces policies within [the MDP policy] discuss some pretty specific terminology like natural features and flood-prone areas which don’t apply to this subject area,” Francis said.  

Within the current MDP, the shores of Big Lake are protected by around 500 metres of setback area, Adryan Slaght, the city's director of planning and development, told the committee. 

Landowners the city consulted in the area also outlined the land south of Meadowview Drive as the most cost-effective area to place future stormwater management facilities, Francis said. The major open spaces designation is incompatible with this land use.  

Further, if the MDP change goes through, the city may need to purchase the lands, Francis said. 

Estimates currently value the land at $21 million to $27 million, not including park development and loss in future non-residential tax assessment. 

While some internal city departments, such as the parks and recreation department, utilities, and planning departments, voiced concerns about the change to major open spaces, Francis said the city’s environment branch supported the change to major open spaces for the same reasons as BLESS: that the land is near Big Lake and includes an important bird area. 

Alberta Health Services (AHS) also supported the proposed amendment, Francis said, outlining that maintaining and protecting natural areas has been found to benefit the physical and mental well-being of those who use the areas. 

Next level of planning could present opportunities for protection

Slaght said the land under Meadowview Drive contains small spruce tree stands that were surveyed previously as holding wildlife habitat value. 

In response to a question from Coun. Mike Killick about whether a developer would be able to cut down the trees, Kristina Peter, city planning branch manager, said the city has a policy that environmentally sensitive areas need to be protected. 

The city recently kicked off work on more detailed planning that includes the area under Meadowview Drive, a document that will be called the St. Albert West Area Structure Plan (ASP). 

“Part of the ASP would be setting out some regulation for those areas to be protected as well,” Peter said. 

Should council approve its committee’s recommendation, Druett said he still sees a way forward to protect the land with the St. Albert West ASP planning process. 

“That’s where we’ll be giving our input, and that might be an opportunity to come up with something that works,” Druett said. 

Coun. Natalie Joly said Monday evening that she voted to rescind the change to major open spaces because the information administration provided was comprehensive. 

“The particular designation [of major open spaces] is not meant for the type of use that was being proposed,” Joly said, noting the committee heard the city is going to need stormwater management facilities in that area. “That’s a really straightforward one.”

Council’s committee voted unanimously to recommend rescinding the change.  

The committee recommendation will come before council on June 20. 

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks