Safe injection sites have been a topic of debate recently in the city of Edmonton.
So, what is a safe injection site? It is a facility that provides a safe and hygienic environment, equipped with sterile needles, on-site medical personnel and on-site counsellors for users of IV (intravenous) drugs.
According to Global News: “On Monday (May 1), the Community and Public Services Committee will be discussing a report that shows 74 per cent of 1,869 survey respondents agree with the city’s proposed approach.”
There is one existing facility in Canada in Vancouver, which has been successful. The city of Vancouver website stated the benefits of such a facility includes a “reduction in the number of overdose deaths, and provides an opportunity for multiple contacts with health care staff, social workers, and other individuals who can help users move toward healthier choices, such as drug treatment programs, primary health care, and other social services. It also reduces HIV and hepatitis C transmission, and ensures that injecting equipment remains inside and is not discarded in the community, while reducing risks to the community as the open consumption of drugs can be more easily discouraged.”
The debate, in the context of Edmonton, has now reached the national level, with several MPs becoming involved. Those opposing the proposition include St. Albert MP Michael Cooper, who posted on twitter “Report to #yeg Council on injection sites shocking. No meaningful public consultation. No mention of treatment & prevention.”
A handful of Edmonton-area MPs have voiced similar concerns: that the concentration of sites in one area would negatively affect the quality of life of people living in the area.
Those opposing the safe injection sites seem to be ignoring the report going to committee, which says, according to Global News, “there were six open houses, an online questionnaire, meetings with community leagues and door knocking around each of the agencies where the service will be provided.”
The benefits of safe injection sites seem straightforward and logical, backed by countless studies and research. A successful facility in near-by Vancouver is further evidence of the success we could have in our own city. Ultimately, the contraction of diseases from IV needles is a major public safety concern, which could be prevented through safe injection sites.
MPs in opposition claim there is no mention of treatment and prevention, and yet, by providing users with access to supports and care, safe injection sites act as a more effective treatment than the alternative – addicts being left on the streets, with no supports to speak of.
It is unfortunate so many MPs have yet again pandered to beliefs bred in misinformation and fear. Safe injection sites create a solution to many problems in our inner city, and it is irresponsible for our leaders to oppose such solutions.
The reality is, current preventive measures are not sufficient, but treatment, and prevention of the spread of diseases can be achieved through safe injection sites.
Jennifer Hamilton is a local student and writer.
