View our mobile site

Distracted driving issue at full attention


  |  Posted: Wednesday, Feb 19, 2014 03:00 pm

Comments    |   

Print    |   


Youíre sitting at a red light. The light finally turns green, but the car in front of you doesnít move. You wait patiently for about five seconds, but the jerk continues to sit idle. You lay on the horn, and the startled Neanderthal in front of you lifts his head and lurches his car forward.

If you have a driverís license, chances are youíve had the unpleasant experience of being stuck behind a narcissistic, oblivious cellphone texter who canít possibly wait until heís arrived safely at his destination to make that all-important text.

Aside from making oneís blood boil, one could almost swear that cellphone usage while driving has actually proliferated since the distracted driving law came into effect in 2011. That could be because the current law isnít much of a deterrent. A text addict isnít likely to stop on account of a $172 fine. The fine could be doubled and it would hardly have an impact.

Distracted driving is a serious problem; itís blamed for 20 to 30 per cent of all vehicle collisions. Itís not just cellphones either. People use their cars as their powder room and apply makeup or shave while zooming down the road. They use it as their home office, making notes on a piece of paper that lies in the passengerís seat. They use it as their kennel, and let Sparky sit on their lap.

Unfortunately, distracted driving doesnít come with the societal stigma that drinking and driving carries. Those of us who are old enough to remember can recall the days when drinking and driving was quietly accepted by society. In fact, it was practically a rite of passage. If you grew up in the í60s and í70s, youíll recall that people didnít think twice about getting blasted and then driving themselves (and their friends) home. Society has come a long way in the last 40-plus years. Today, the punishment is steep, complete with a criminal record. Drunk driving, of course, still happens, but it is not tolerated by society.

Distracted driving can have the same fatal consequences that drinking and driving can have, so why should the punishment drastically differ? It is today what drinking and driving was in the í60s and í70s Ė those who do it think nothing of it and genuinely donít believe it is dangerous.

If distracted driving is to become intolerable to society, then the law must reflect the seriousness of the behaviour. Manitoba is on the right track with its two demerit point deduction for anyone caught driving while distracted. Manitobaís law isnít severe enough, but impacting someoneís driving record is certainly a step in the right direction.

Alberta has a chance to show real leadership on distracted driving and implement a law that reflects the seriousness of the behaviour. After all, distracted driving can have deadly consequences, and a $172 fine does not move the meter on what should be an intolerable offence.


NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The St. Albert Gazette welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. We reserve the right to close the comments thread for stories that are deemed especially sensitive. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.

All comments are moderated, and if approved could take up to 48 hours to appear on the website.

blog comments powered by Disqus