Council nixes adults-only ban

Council defeats bylaw changes that would essentially ban adult businesses from city

Wednesday, Sep 01, 2010 06:00 am | By Ryan Tumilty | St. Albert Gazette

City council defeated a proposed bylaw Monday night that would have made it impossible to set up strip clubs, swingers’ club or adult video stores.

Councillors Lorie Garritty, Carol Watamaniuk and James Burrows voted against the proposed rule changes, while Mayor Nolan Crouse, Coun. Roger Lemieux and Coun. Gareth Jones voted in favour.

Coun. Len Bracko missed Monday’s meeting, resulting in a tie vote, which defeats any motion.

Under the current land-use bylaw, adult entertainment is listed as a discretionary use in the city’s two industrial areas, Campbell Business Park and Riel Business Park.

The bylaw sets out a series of conditions for adult entertainment including setbacks from residential areas, schools, parks and arenas.

Crouse initiated the proposed bylaw change last November, essentially looking for an all-out ban on adults-only businesses. Administration provided council with the options to accomplish the ban, but recommended against such a course of action.

City manager Bill Holtby said the existing bylaw severely limits places where adult entertainment businesses are allowed. If the city adopted an outright ban they could face a legal challenge.

“It is very, very restrictive. It is almost hard to find a place in the community to open up one of these establishments,” Holtby told council. “We are not being restrictive to a point where saying it can’t be anywhere in the community and [changing] that is where the charter challenge would come in.”

Lemieux, one of the votes in favour of the ban, said he doesn’t want to see a large strip club or adult video store right on the edge of the city when Anthony Henday Drive is completed.

He said the issue of a legal challenge is something the city could deal with if it were to come up.

“I would rather cross that bridge if we ever needed to.”

Garritty, who opposed the ban, wanted to avoid the potential for legal challenges.

“If it were to have passed and be taken to a charter challenge the advice we were getting is we would lose that battle.”

Garritty said he is comfortable with restrictions that are already in place, which include notifying neighbours if an adults only business wants to set up shop.

Crouse said he may explore another avenue to achieve the bylaw changes after the election, but it is not a pressing issue.

“It is not something that is imminent. We don’t have any applications for people wanting to have a strip club or a swingers’ bar.”

Even though the restrictions on adult businesses are pretty stringent, fundamentally they don’t go far enough, Crouse said, adding under existing rules someone could build a strip club near Servus Credit Union Place.

“They don’t go far enough in my opinion,” he said. “I don’t think we should have a strip club next to Servus Place — period.”


Comments

RobF said:
Half of St. Albert's City Council apparently doesn't understand or care about their legal limitations, even after St. Albert's City Manager explains them.

Land use bylaws can be used only to zone legal activities, not to ban them.

Attempting to pass a bylaw that clearly infringes upon the Charter of Rights is arrogance and incompetence, with consequences.

The consequences are that judges would review legal precedents and strike it down, awarding costs. That would leave St. Albert citizens with no land use bylaw and a hefty legal bill.

See: Charter of Rights and Freedoms: fundamental freedoms (84-16E)
http://dsp-psd.tpsgc.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/CIR/8416-e.htm

"However, a complete ban on a form of expression is more difficult to justify than a partial ban. The government must show that only a full prohibition will enable it to achieve its objective."
...
" 'Burlesque dancing' was held to be a form of expression in R. v. Zikman, a decision of the Ontario Provincial Court"
September 4, 2010 @ 10:41 pm Report Abuse
Forums message number 329967 has been flagged as offensive by a user.

Category:
Category 2:
Category 3:
Message ID: 329967
Post On: September 4, 2010
Posted by User #: RobF
Posted by IP:

Message:
Half of St. Albert's City Council apparently doesn't understand or care about their legal limitations, even after St. Albert's City Manager explains them.

Land use bylaws can be used only to zone legal activities, not to ban them.

Attempting to pass a bylaw that clearly infringes upon the Charter of Rights is arrogance and incompetence, with consequences.

The consequences are that judges would review legal precedents and strike it down, awarding costs. That would leave St. Albert citizens with no land use bylaw and a hefty legal bill.

See: Charter of Rights and Freedoms: fundamental freedoms (84-16E)
http://dsp-psd.tpsgc.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/CIR/8416-e.htm

"However, a complete ban on a form of expression is more difficult to justify than a partial ban. The government must show that only a full prohibition will enable it to achieve its objective."
...
" 'Burlesque dancing' was held to be a form of expression in R. v. Zikman, a decision of the Ontario Provincial Court"

   
Got something to say? Post Comment!

You haven't entered any comments to post!

The St. Albert Gazette welcomes your opinions and comments. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.

In order to post comments on our web site, you must validate your email address. An email was sent to you when you registered that included an activation link. If you have not yet done so, please click on the link to activate your account.

If you did not receive your activation email, please click here to have it resent.

To post comments, you must login or register on stalbertgazette.com
Story URL:

Copyright © 2010 Great West Newspapers Limited Partnership. All rights reserved. The contents of this website are protected by copyright and may be used only for your personal non-commercial purposes. All other rights are reserved and commercial use is prohibited. To make use of any of this material you must first obtain permission of the owner of the copyright. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.